Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

The Effects of Community Home Visit and Peer Group Nutrition Intervention Delivery Platforms on Nutrition Outcomes in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

0 comments
Affiliation

The Hospital for Sick Children (Janmohamed, Sohani, Bhutta); University of Adelaide (Lassi)

Date
Summary

"...findings underscore the importance of interpersonal community platforms for improving infant and young child feeding practices and children’s nutritional status in LMICs."

Emerging evidence indicates that preventing the adverse effects of undernutrition requires programmes that enhance the coverage and effectiveness of direct nutrition interventions, particularly those focused on actions during the first 1,000 days of life. This paper synthesises evidence for the effectiveness of nutrition-specific intervention delivery platforms for improving nutrition outcomes in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).

A systematic literature search for studies published from 1997 to June 2018 resulted in the inclusion of 83 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised, and controlled before–after studies across a variety of delivery platforms. (All included studies used an experimental design, though the overall quality of evidence was low for the majority of meta-analysed outcomes.) Though the reviewed studies covered community-, financial- and technology-based nutrition intervention delivery platforms, this paper reports only on meta-analysed outcomes for community health worker (CHW)/lay counselor home visits and mother/peer groups, which emerged as the most widely used community-based platforms for delivering nutrition-specific interventions in the review. These studies utilised one or both of these platforms to deliver nutrition education/behaviour change communication (BCC) to mothers/caregivers of young children.

Compared to care as usual, CHW home visits increased early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) (odds ratio (OR): 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12, 1.99; n = 10 RCTs) and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) (OR: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.28, 8.56; n = 9 RCTs). Mother/peer groups were effective for improving children's minimum dietary diversity (OR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.17, 4.70; n = 4) and minimum meal frequency (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.61, 3.31; n = 3). Pooled estimates from studies using both home visit and group platforms showed positive results for EIBF (OR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.12, 4.05; n = 9) and EBF (OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.70, 3.46; n = 12). A 23% reduction in the odds of under-5 wasting (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.89) was observed across four studies that used the home visit and group platform, compared to usual care.

Reflecting on the findings, the researchers note, for example:

  • The lack of effect of the mother/peer group platform on breastfeeding in the review was unexpected and may have been due to differences in programme factors across studies, e.g., the frequency, content, and facilitation of group sessions. The review was not able to separate the effects of using trained CHWs versus peer volunteer facilitators for conducting group sessions. Further research should explore whether facilitator characteristics may affect programme targets.
  • The higher likelihood of EIBF and EBF in pooled analyses of studies involving both home visit and mother/peer group platforms suggests that home visits are important for breastfeeding promotion. The researchers speculate that this finding is due to the one-to-one reinforcement of knowledge and skills acquired in group sessions and/or mothers feeling more comfortable discussing and practicing breastfeeding in the privacy of home settings.
  • The finding that the mother/peer group platform is effective for improving the quantity and quality of young children's diets may be due, in part, to participatory cooking demonstrations that frequently occur alongside counseling/coaching during group sessions. This finding is consistent with a 2018 review of 36 studies that showed that women's groups focused on behaviour change are beneficial for improving child feeding practices in South Asia.
  • The observed 23% reduction in the odds of under-5 wasting using the combined home visit and group platform and suggests acute thinness may be more responsive to education/behaviour change interventions than the long-term nutritional deficits underlying stunting.

As community home visits and peer groups "tend to be established platforms within community-based child survival programmes in many countries, leveraging them for integrating nutrition-focused interventions...offers sizeable opportunities for nutrition behaviour change in these settings. Therefore, the findings present an evidence-based rationale for continued investments in these community initiatives."

Source

Nutrients 2020, 12, 440; doi:10.3390/nu12020440. Image caption/credit: Mother support group leader Gladys Nagilai and other mothers with their budding tomato crop in a greenhouse in Lodwar, northern Kenya. The crops were planted by a mother support group that includes 13 mothers who meet once a month to learn from each other (and from nutritionists) about infant and child nutrition. DFID - UK Department for International Development via Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)