Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Supporting media: what works and why?

0 comments
Image
Your Blog

I've just finished writing a synthesis report about how media can be supported in countries where media freedoms and rights are constrained. It was commissioned by BBC Media Action who asked me to bring together the findings of five case studies covering Bangladesh, Cambodia, Syria, South Sudan and Uganda, commissioned from five other writers.  The finished report is entitled What Works and Why? and can be found here.  

My first reaction to the task was sceptical - would it be possible to find any workable strategies to support good quality media and journalism across five very different societies?  Although some of the countries chosen were not closed autocracies, journalists in all five countries are under all sorts of threats and stress, and the right to free expression remains a cause for international concern in all five.  I was curious to see what initiatives donors were supporting under such difficult circumstances.  

To my surprise I was able to extract quite a long list of workable strategies which are being carried out by courageous people from both outside and inside these five countries.

It was heartening to discover the experiences of community radio activists in Cambodia, such as Beehive Radio, which survive despite the odds.  It was humbling to write about the BBC camera operator in Syria who was imprisoned for three days and tortured for trying to record a more balanced story than the Assad government wants the world to see.  It was inspiring to write about the amazing popularity of UN radio in South Sudan, Radio Miraya, despite government crackdowns.

There are many strategies that can work - even in constrained environments.  These include avoiding government controls by broadcasting media content via short-wave radio, satellite or the internet from outside the country, or working online to support and train journalism and activists. 

It is possible to work from inside a country even when its government clamps down on the media.  These include working carefully with the state - with the state broadcaster, for example - and supporting local press freedom groups, such as local chapters of Transparency International, as in Bangladesh.  I found several examples of support for local media advocacy groups, and for the relay of foreign media content by local media outlets.  Many different types of capacity building are possible, such as focusing on topics that are either neutral (like business training) or of 'public interest' (such as health or environmental topics) in order to be seen as non-political. Where conditions permit, there are examples of capacity building for local media houses, especially with carefully selected independent or community outlets. This strategy has worked very well in Uganda. Developing pre-packaged content and programming is sometimes necessary when live media reporting of contentious issues is limited by arbitrary restrictions. 

I invite you to read my synthesis study but especially to go to the case studies from the five countries themselves (available here), to discover all the fascinating and inspiring detail of what is possible, even in really difficult circumstances.  

 

By Mary Myers for BBC Media Action

Click here to access all of Mary Myers's blogs on this website.