Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
4 minutes
Read so far

HIV/AIDS Communication for Development Roundtable

0 comments
Affiliation

as presented at the VIII International Communication for Development Roundtable, Managua, Nicaragua

Date
Summary

Click here to download a Power Point Presentation of this document.



Statement

Communication theories and models do not provide an adequate foundation on which to develop interventions for HIV/AIDS in the regions




We are structuring the roundtable discusions around those theories and models.


Fact

Communication efforts are only one of the multiple interventions needed to reduce the epidemic, can not work alone.


Statement

We need strategic directions and multilevel interventions


Contradiction

The participants of this roudtable are in their majority communication specialist.


Fact

In social programmes we nedd to articulat a wide range of interventions, including communication interventions.Learn from experience.


Statement

We need engagement and leadership


Contradiction

We are aiming to have only a declaration (UN HIV/AIDS declaration quotes eleven more)


Fact

We need now strategic multidisciplinary operational drafts for each region with outputs and activities (leading to an action plan), based on the declaration on HIV/AIDS (UN special session, August 2001).


UN special session on HIV/AIDS

Declaration of commitment


2 August 2001


National levelBy 2003


1. implementation of multisectoral national comprehensive strategies and financing plans.


2. integrate HIV/AIDS interventions into the mainstream of (national and local) development planning


International/National level


1. Legitimize the HIV/AIDS international political agendas


2. Intensify international cooperation and coordination


UN/National level


1. Greater interaction and Coordination of the UN system (integrated approach)


2. By 2003, help to establish and strengthen mechanism that involve the private sector and civil society partners (vulnerable groups)


UN Reform: CCA/UNDAF (Common Country Assesment/UN Dev. Assistance Framework).

UNDG (UNICEF, UNFPA, UNDP, WFP). ECOSOC regional com.



Reform in the UN System


Adoption of key reform instruments by the entire UN System: Ad. Comm. On Coord. Members

  • UNDP
  • UNFPA
  • UNICEF
  • WFP
  • ODCCP
  • UNHCR
  • IFAD
  • UNCTAD
  • UNEP
  • ILO
  • FAO
  • UNESCO
  • UNIDO
  • WHO
  • World Bank
  • IMF
  • UN

    -DESA

    -OCHA

    -HCHR

    -Reg. Commissions

    -UNU

    -UNITAR
  • UNRWA
  • ITU
  • ICAO
  • UPU
  • WMO
  • WIPO
  • IAEA
  • WTO


National level


Activitites include:

  • prevention programmes
  • care strategies
  • intersectoral participation
  • legal and regulatory back-up
  • public policies
  • human rights
  • women and girls empowerment
  • children orphaned and affected
  • poverty reduction strategies
  • emergency programmes
  • resources,
  • follow-up mechanism


Prevention the main stay of our response


By 2003 establish national prevention targets

  • reduce by 2005 HIV prevalence among men and women aged 15 / 24 by 25 per cent
  • ensure that at least 90 per cent of young men and women have acces to information, education and services
  • reduce by 2005 the proportion of infants infected by 20 per cent, 80 per cent pregnant women accessing antenatal care, counselling


By 2005 a wide range of prevention programmes

  • Groups at high or increasing rate or risk
  • Young men and women 15-24 and social net
  • Pregnant women
  • Work sectors (public, private and informal)
  • Migrants and mobile workers


Fact


We need asap strategic multidisciplinary operational drafts for each region with outputs and activities (leading to action plans formulatated by 2003), based on the declaration on HIV/AIDS (UN special session, August 2001).


Base line problems:

  1. Lack of precision of the word advocacy
  2. The stiffness of communication theories, models and approaches
  3. The implications of human rights
  4. The implications of cultural diversity



Behind or in front every human communicativeaction there is an intention


Different communicative intentions:


A. Modification of individual competences (knowledge, skills, attitudes and values) sound behavior


Multilevel interventions(the individual and his social relationships)


Basic human needs -> Basic needs for learning (dialogue)-> Modification of individual competences and capacities (empower)


B. Mobilization of social and political support for HIV/AIDS programmes


Multilevel interventions(social and political articulations)


Institutional positioning and image(credibility and convoquing power)


C. Fund raising


Each of these group of interventions have different outputs, indicators, stakeholders, methodologies, strategies and specialist.


We advocate and apply communication interventionfor each one of theseintentions


advocating is only one step to get what we want(political will, etc.)


and communication efforts are only one of the multiple interventions needed to reduce the epidemic.


  • Committment Support
  • Articulation
  • Participation
  • Resources
  • Soustenability
  • Self-reliance


I am not presenting here a paradigm or a model (Less "advocacy communication" which is a blurry concept I don't use). I am presenting here a participatory methodology for "mobilizing social and political support" which was build up with help of UNFPA field offices, counterparts and civil society organizations involved during CST missions.


2. Mobilisation of Social and Political Support for population issues


how to transform a health issue into a political one


Methodology to be transfered in a multisectoral group dynamics


Objective: identify work lines, purposes, environments for action, activities and actors involved


UNFPA Programatic lines




unfavorablesocial & politicalcontext

  • confuse
  • distorted
  • sistematicaly opposed
  • diversity of interests
  • shortage of resources
  • with hidden intentions


  • Scattered Funds
  • Strong opponents
  • Weak Civil Society
  • Lack of resources
  • Non-coordination
  • Barriers
  • Inefficiency
  • Lack of leadership
  • Poverty and vulnerability


Mobilization of SPS is aimed to those individuals or groups of individuals whose decisions, resources and opinions influence or can influence on social and political process


1. Social and political processes

  1. Revision and formulation of laws
  2. Formulation and implementation of public policies and action plans
  3. Formulation of sectoral regulation
  4. Allocation of resources
  5. Social vigilance of services
  6. Civil society participation
  7. Public opinion mainstreaming


2. Environments for action:



Process that take place in Environments for action:

  1. The legal Framework
  2. Public policies (in the context of poverty
  3. reduction and State reform efforts)

  4. Sectoral regulations
  5. National and sectoral Budget
  6. Services (health, education, social protection) local governments and sectors
  7. Civil society (múltiple) Private sector
  8. Public Sphere (included the media, school system and cultural systems)


Actores clave involucrados


Public Sphere


Autonomous social space, in wich citizens process opinions, send forth judgements, raise demands to the State, and also receive and interpret information through the mass media


Public Sphere levels

  1. Local (clubs, development projects)
  2. National (national communication media, school system, cultural system)
  3. Global (international mass media nets, news agencies, multinational fora, etc.).


Civil Society


Social multiple organisation, voluntarely self generated, higly independent from Sate and limited by a legal order and a set of shared regulations. Involve all citizens acting colectively in a public sphere.


Is is an intermediary entity between the private sphere and the State.


(exclude family life and individuals, recreation and religious activities, for profit entreprises and political efforts to control the State)


Components

  1. Social Political Process
  2. Environments for action
  3. Actors involved


We look for...(groups of indicators)

  1. Political will
  2. Intersectoral consensus and articulation of public policies and action plans (aliances and coalitions)
  3. Strengthening of the national capacity
  4. Citizenship participation and vigilance (social nets and a wide supportive front)
  5. Favorable public opinion
  6. Management of oposition and public debate
  7. Financial resources


HOW?

  1. Establish core priorities.
  2. Find multilevel articulations.
  3. Design a comprehensive SPS strategy.
  4. Dimension the SPS effort and responsibilities.
  5. Build ad-hoc SPS ARGUMENTS AND SCENARIOS.
  6. Apply the SPS strategy (acces chanels, alliances, coalitions, IMPROVISE).
  7. Monitor, evaluate and be aware of opportunities.




Components


Priorities and articulations

  1. Social Political Process
  2. Environments for action
  3. Actors involved
  4. Arguments and scenarios
  5. Acces chanels


A major reason for the establishment of UNAIDS was the acknowledgement of the complexity of the epidemic and the clear need for a multisectoral multidisciplinary response to it


Conclusion


We should work with multidisciplinary teams and articulate efforts around these simple ideas we can share and coordinate:


A.

Interventions to modify individual /community competencies and capacities


B.

Interventions to mobilize social and political support


C.

Interventions to mobilize financial resources


Articulate efforts and interventions


Personal competences + Supportive environment

Democracy + Quality of life + Poverty reduction


People as objects for changePeople as agents of their own change
testing and delivering messagessupportingdialogue and debate
conveying information from technical expertFacilitate exchange of cumulative knowledge
persuading peopleIncrease options, opportunities and the right to choose



National level


Activitites include:

  • prevention programmes
  • care strategies
  • intersectoral participation
  • legal and regulatory back-up
  • public policies
  • human rights
  • women and girls empowerment
  • children orphaned and affected
  • poverty reduction strategies
  • emergency programmes
  • resources,
  • follow-up mechanism