Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Changing Gender and Social Norms, Attitudes and Behaviours

0 comments
Affiliation

University of Birmingham

Date
Summary

"What rigorous evidence is there on what types of programming interventions work to bring about changes in gender and social norms, and changes in wider attitudes and behaviours?"

This annotated bibliography presents studies of programmes that aim to bring about changes in gender and social norms, as well as changes in wider attitudes and behaviours. Much of the literature and some programme designs recognise the need to change social norms in order to change behaviours, such as HIV/AIDS prevention and better sanitation and hygiene. The report looks at interventions targeting: the individual and inter-relational levels (e.g., workshops); the community level (e.g., community dialogue, community mobilisation, and youth initiatives); and the wider societal level (e.g., mass media, edutainment, and social media). It highlights the effects of such interventions, focusing on rigorous evaluations. For each report, the full citation is provided, as is the URL.

The opening few items are "synthesis reports", which reveal key points including but not limited to the following:

  • There is strong evidence from a review by the Overseas Development Institute of 61 programmes that communication programmes are an effective way to challenge gender discriminatory attitudes and practices. Integrated programmes (including non-communications activities) have overall been slightly more effective than stand-alone communications programmes.
  • A look at Oxfam evaluations highlighted the power of creative and interactive means of communication through role plays, dramas and public hearings, rather than passive awareness-raising through leaflets or informational channels. Engaging influential community leaders, religious leaders, and duty bearers appeared to be effective in awareness-raising.
  • A review of 142 articles and documents revealed 61 interventions, which aimed to prevent intimate partner violence (IPV) and sexual violence (SV) among adolescents found that programmes with longer term investments and repeated exposure to ideas delivered in different settings over time have better results than single awareness-raising or discussion sessions.

Subsequent interventions explore studies of strategies carried out at the individual and relationship level, at the community level, and at the societal level. Selected findings include:

  • Changing individual attitudes may be insufficient to change behaviours. Greater efforts are often needed to engage the larger community in multi-component initiatives designed to change social norms.
  • Community-level interventions often have components aimed at mobilising specific people (change agents) within a community to encourage others to change by fostering dialogue and diffusing messages to people beyond direct participants. There is some evidence that community-wide mobilisation approaches are effective and can have a wide reach.
  • Interventions that involve group education with boys and men (sometimes in combination with women and girls) and adopt a gender transformative approach and intense community mobilisation are considered promising.
  • The use of mass media and marketing approaches is an efficient way of reaching large numbers of people at relatively low cost. It is well-suited to: modelling and promoting new (non-violent) norms; promoting the benefits of new norms; changing attitudes towards harmful behaviours and norms at scale; and promoting stories of change. There is some evidence that multi-media communications can change attitudes and norms relating to violence and gender inequality among a large intended population.

Governance and Social Development Resource Centre (GSDRC) Knowledge, evidence, and learning for Development (K4D) helpdesk reports like this one are commissioned by the United Kingdom (UK) Department for International Development and other Government departments.

Source

GSDRC website, May 9 2017. Image credit: DFID