Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
3 minutes
Read so far

Saving Journalism: A Vision for the Post-Covid World

0 comments
Affiliation

Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs

Date
Summary

"Dozens of plans to help save journalism have emerged since the Covid-19 pandemic decimated media outlets around the world."

This report surveys some of the initiatives that have emerged, or that have been accelerated, to help save journalism since the COVID-19 pandemic devastated many media outlets around the world. It evaluates where they currently stand, assesses the likelihood of success, and profiles the key players. The purpose is to share these initiatives so that countries can learn from one another about how to support quality news and information.

The report explains how, even as the need for clear reliable and accurate information has increased, media across the globe have been negatively impacted by COVID-19: Journalists have been laid off or their salaries cut, print editions have been suspended, and shrinking revenue (particularly advertising revenue) has crippled newsrooms, forcing many to close completely. The urgency of the financial troubles hitting journalism in 2020 has led organisations around the world to come up with creative solutions. The report shares some of these initiatives, using a taxonomy suggested by media funder Nishant Lalwani from the Luminate Foundation. He saw a number of proposals come across his desk in 2020 and divides efforts to help journalism during the COVID-19 pandemic into four categories: more private funding; public subsidies; new business models; and a tax on the tech platforms.

1. More Private Funding
Initiatives discussed here include attempts to galvanise increased funding from foundations, development aid, philanthropy, and venture capital. For example, as soon as the epidemic hit, a number of foundations stepped up grant-making to help media outlets. One initiative was the Independent Emergency News Relief Coordination, which involved getting donors to coordinate and scale up their giving. It was initiated by the International Fund for Public Interest Media, which seeks to help government and foundations join forces to support public interest media. A number of small organisations and foundations that set up emergency funds around the world are also mentioned, such as a grant that the Open Society Foundation South Africa gave to the South African National Editors' Forum (SANEF), which partnered with the Social Justice Initiative to create a Media Relief Fund supporting journalists who lost their jobs in 2020.

The report also highlights a proposal by Steve Waldman, a former senior advisor to the chair of the Federal Communications Commission and a co-founder of Report for America, to transform the United States (US)' roughly 6,700 privately owned newspapers into more community-grounded and financially independent institutions. He suggests the creation of a nonprofit "replanting fund" that would identify candidate newspapers and reorganise their corporate structures to make them both financially independent and more responsive to community needs. Another initiative discussed is the Journalism Emergency Relief Fund (JERF) established by the Google News Initiative (GNI) in April 2020. Although its goal is to promote a healthy media ecosystem for start-ups, it established an emergency fund that gives out relatively small grants for niche media outlets around the world to help them cope with COVID-19.

2. Public Subsidy Efforts
The report highlights some government efforts to help outlets and freelancers during the COVID-19 crisis. For example, Australia created a US$40 million Public Interest News Gathering Fund to help maintain public interest journalism in regional areas, while Norway allocated around US$3.2 million to media outlets that lost income from advertising due to the virus. In Ecuador, two universities (San Francisco de Quito and Equator Technological University) and two media outlets (El Universo and Código Vidrio) teamed up to win a grant from the US government to counteract dis- and misinformation related to the pandemic.

The report makes the point that along with the funds has come an understanding that the industry needs ambitious solutions to the massive problem of funding. For example, in the US, there is renewed interest in government support for media with groups looking at policies used in countries such as France, Canada, and Norway that already support quality journalism. Other longer-term solutions include those by Steve Waldman and others who are promoting a media voucher system similar to France's 2009 initiative to give newspaper subscriptions to high school students, and are assisting with the design of the Local Journalism Sustainability Act. It is suggested that funding for local journalism could come from a number of sources, including taxes on internet advertising, media mergers, or airwave license allocation (also known as spectrum auctions).

3. New Business Models
In Southern Africa, Ntibinyane Ntibinyane from Botswana's INK Centre for Investigative Journalism and Dumisani Muleya, a Zimbabwean reporter and editor with The NewsHawks, put together a proposal for funding that could be used to help independent newspapers in the region to transition to digital and build their sustainability beyond the pandemic. The project includes plans to lobby local government officials for broader government support of local media.

4. Getting Big Tech to Pay for News
In the midst of the pandemic, Australia's competition authority has made an effort to get Google and Facebook to pay for news. Part of what is considered novel about this approach is that the government is using competition law instead of copyright law, which has not worked in Europe because Google refused to pay. Australia's new legislation - the Mandatory News Media Bargaining Code - would force Google and Facebook to pay for news. The report explains this legislation and assesses the potential outcomes of this effort.

In conclusion, the report makes the point that there are two key, parallel routes forward. "One is to provide the help necessary to keep news outlets alive during what are undoubtedly the toughest financial times they've ever seen. The other is to lay the groundwork for a transition to a more sustainable local-news ecosystem - whether the news organizations themselves are existing outlets that have evolved or new ones designed more fully to represent the communities they cover."

Video