Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Complexity-Aware Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning for Social and Behavior Change Interventions

0 comments
Image
SummaryText

"With a complexity-aware MEL approach mutual trust and transparency strengthen practice..."

Social and behaviour change (SBC) projects are complex, operating at multiple and interconnected levels of the social ecology and physical environment. Activities may be implemented differently than planned, and individual stakeholders, including community members and implementers, may understand and respond to project activities differently. Understanding how projects operate in such complex environments, then, is critical to know how SBC projects affect communities (and vice versa) and ultimately, how projects achieve or do not achieve expected and sustained outcomes. In the context of supporting monitoring, evaluation & learning (MEL) activities, CORE Group's SBC Working Group has developed a set of complexity-aware tools are intended to help design and evaluate SBC-focused interventions.

Tools in this set include:

  1. An advocacy brief [8 pages, PDF], written by Anna Martin and Katrina Mitchell, designed to help guide communication with donors and to help build fluency in communicating how to monitor and evaluate SBC interventions;
  2. A SBC Complexity Indicators Matrix (SCIM) [36 pages, PDF], written by Paul Shelter Fast, Susan Igras, and Joseph Petraglia, with quantitative and qualitative indicators related to adaptation, learning, and collaboration that can be used in proposals and work plans; and
  3. A checklist [4 pages, PDF], written by Lenette Golding, intended to help in the consistency and completeness of documenting SBC interventions. It is organised according to the major ways in which complexity affects most SBC interventions:
    • Contextual complexity: The environment and implementation process itself shape outcomes of an intervention.
    • Temporal complexity: Interventions evolve over time as intended populations and implementers change behaviours and come to new understandings and as programmatic environments shift in response to new constraints, opportunities, and priorities.
    • Interpretive complexity: As interventions are social activities, practitioners should acknowledge that every stakeholder understands the intervention partially and differently and has a unique perspective.

The SBC Working Group contributes to improved maternal and child health outcomes by strengthening the capacity of CORE members to design and implement effective SBC strategies while documenting and disseminating experiences.

Publishers

Publication Date
Source

CORE Group website, August 23 2021. Image credit: Malaria Consortium